Poorly worded opinion polls exaggerated the extent to which Americans blamed Saddam Hussein for the 9/11 attacks
December 1, 2004

The first formal study to investigate U.S. public opinion about who was to blame for the 9-11 attacks challenges a popular theory.

The story of widespread misconceptions about Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's role in the September 2001 attacks grabbed headlines around the first anniversary of the attacks. This discovery-noted in national surveys at the time-led many commentators to suggest that Americans who blamed Saddam instead of Osama bin Laden had somehow been misled by the Bush administration. Instead, political science professor Scott Althaus says the levels of misperception were even higher in the months before President Bush began building a public case for war against Iraq, and these levels "were artificially inflated by the way those survey questions were worded."

Althaus says the reason the public assigned culpability to Saddam can be attributed to two things: American's predisposition to believing Saddam was the culprit, and the wording and format of polling questions put to them. These questions overstated the degree of misperception that Saddam was the villain behind Sept. 11.

"In other words, this mistaken belief was not a product of the Bush administration'sinformation campaign," says Althaus. "Instead, the Bush administration inheritedand played into a favorable climate of public opinion, which may have greatlyfacilitated its task of building public support for war against Iraq."

The earliest surveys in the days immediately following Sept. 11 showed that Americansspontaneously mentioned Osama bin Laden as the main person responsible for theattacks. After September 2001, pollsters switched from recording spontaneousresponses to presenting respondents with "forced-choice" questions. This switch, "probablymade in order to more efficiently process the survey data, had the unintendedeffect of exaggerating the degree to which Americans saw a connection betweenHussein and the attacks," Althaus says.

"Saddam was widely seen as a bad guy by ordinary Americans since the Gulf Warof 1991. He later tried to assassinate former President Bush and was regularlybombed by U.S. and British planes long before 9/11 for violations of the no-flyzone. Thus, the stage was set for people to believe that Saddam would try tostrike back using terrorism."

Read article: What’s behind the surge in redrawing legislative maps?
What’s behind the surge in redrawing legislative maps?
 What accounts for the number of partisan gerrymandering efforts midway through the 10-year census cycle? Brian J. Gaines is a professor of political science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the Honorable W. Russell Arrington Professor...
Read article: Hood Internship gives LAS students insight on higher education
Hood Internship gives LAS students insight on higher education
 The College of Liberal Arts & Sciences is providing undergraduates a valuable, behind-the-scenes opportunity that offers a glimpse at how a major academic unit works. Called the Peter and Joan Hood Internship, this year’s intern, Colette Roth, is right in the middle of it and describes...
Read article: The problem solver
The problem solver
 Senior in political science Leana Shin was honored in November at the Global Undergraduate Awards in Ireland for her research paper.The GUA is an international pan-disciplinary award program for undergraduate research. Shin’s paper was selected out...