In the animal kingdom, the safety of trees allows for a longer lifespan.
April 1, 2010

Scott Williams and Milena Shattuck, doctoral candidates in anthropology, have found that tree-dwelling mammals live longer than those who live on the ground. (Photo by L. Brian Stauffer)
Scott Williams and Milena Shattuck, doctoral candidates in anthropology, have found that tree-dwelling mammals live longer than those who live on the ground. (Photo by L. Brian Stauffer)

As species go, human ideas for living a long life are such a drag. Watch your cholesterol. Consult a physician. One 105-year-old British woman made news by saying the key was celibacy. All rules that squirrels flaunt shamelessly. To them it’s simple: Climb a tree.

In fact, it’s such a wise move that anthropologists at the U of I have determined that mammals that spend most of their time in the relative safety of trees have evolved longer lifespans than similarly sized mammals living the hard life on the ground. The finding deepened understanding of the link between lifespan and environment.

“One of the predictions of the evolutionary theory of aging is that if you can reduce sources of extrinsic mortality (death from predators, disease, accidents, etc.), you’ll end up exposing some of the late-acting mutations to natural selection, and therefore evolve longer lifespans,” says Scott Williams, who conducted the study with fellow doctoral candidate Milena Shattuck.

Determining the lifespan of wild mammals was key. Most wild animals die before succumbing to old age, and even if you do find one that lived a full life, a squirrel never tells its age. So Williams and Shattuck referred to animal data from zoos and other captivity sites in analyzing 776 species from all major divisions of mammals, and they found a consistent and significant relationship between habitat and longevity.

No word on whether these findings apply to squirrels on college campuses, where they seem to have forgotten trees in favor of potato chips and other handouts, but the researchers found two classes of mammals that run contrary to the others. They are marsupials, such as kangaroos, and primates. Aloft or not, the researchers found no significant difference in longevity among similarly sized members of these groups. Shattuck calls them the exceptions that prove the rule.

“Terrestrial marsupials and primates have descended from arboreal ancestors,” she says.

This includes humans, whose relatively long lives researchers attribute to medicine, social behavior, relatively large size, and what’s described as a prehistoric life among the squirrels that allowed us to evolve safely before we took the plunge to the ground.

Read article: Animal Encounters
Animal Encounters
Jane Desmond remembers the day she and several colleagues drove to the great ape center in Des Moines to visit Kanzi, a bonobo who is one of the first non-human primates to show an understanding of human language. The center’s researcher asked Kanzi if his visitors could take...
Read article: Study tracks social, genetic evolution in Asian colobine primates
Study tracks social, genetic evolution in Asian colobine primates
Asian colobines, also known as leaf-eating monkeys, have been on the planet for about 10 million years. Their ancestors crossed land bridges, dispersed across continents, survived the expansion and contraction of ice sheets and learned to live in tropical, temperate and colder climes.  A new...
Read article: College of LAS announces new named faculty positions
College of LAS announces new named faculty positions
Several professors in the College of LAS have recently received named scholar positions for their contributions in education and research at the University of Illinois. The named positions include the Helen Corley Petit Scholars, the I.C. Gunsalus Scholar, and LAS Dean’s Distinguished Professorial...